🔗 Share this article

The British racing team along with Formula One could do with any conclusive outcome during this championship battle between Norris and Piastri being decided through on-track action and without reference to team orders with the title run-in kicks off at the COTA starting Friday.

Singapore Grand Prix aftermath leads to internal strain

After the Marina Bay event’s undoubtedly thorough and stressful post-race analyses dealt with, McLaren is aiming for a fresh start. The British driver was almost certainly fully conscious of the historical context regarding his retort toward his upset colleague during the previous race weekend. During an intense championship duel against Piastri, his reference to a famous Senna well-known quotes was lost on no one yet the occurrence which triggered his statement was of an entirely different nature from incidents characterizing Senna's great rivalries.

“Should you criticize me for simply attempting an inside move of a big gap then you don't belong in F1,” stated Norris regarding his first-lap move to overtake which resulted in the cars colliding.

The remark appeared to paraphrase Senna’s “Should you stop attempting an available gap that exists then you cease to be a racing driver” defence he provided to Sir Jackie Stewart after he ploughed into Alain Prost in Japan back in 1990, ensuring he took the title.

Similar spirit yet distinct situations

Although the attitude is similar, the phrasing is where the similarities end. The late champion confessed he had no intent of letting Prost beat him through the first corner whereas Norris attempted to execute a clean overtake at the Marina Bay circuit. Indeed, it was a perfectly valid effort which received no penalty despite the minor contact he had with his team colleague as he went through. That itself was a result of him clipping the car of Max Verstappen in front of him.

Piastri reacted furiously and, notably, immediately declared that Norris's position gain seemed unjust; suggesting that the two teammates clashing was forbidden by team protocols for racing and Norris should be instructed to give back the position he gained. The team refused, yet it demonstrated that during disputes between them, both will promptly appeal the squad to step in in their favor.

Squad management and fairness being examined

This comes naturally of McLaren’s laudable efforts to allow their racers compete against each other and to try to be as scrupulously fair. Quite apart from creating complex dilemmas when establishing rules over what constitutes fair or unfair – which, under these auspices, now covers misfortune, tactical calls and on-track occurrences like in Marina Bay – there is the question regarding opinions.

Of most import for the championship, six races left, Piastri is ahead of Norris by twenty-two points, there is what each driver perceives as fair and at what point their perspectives might split with that of the McLaren pitwall. That is when their friendly rapport among them may – finally – become a little bit more Senna-Prost.

“It will reach to a situation where minor points count,” said Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff post-race. “Then they’ll start to calculate and back-calculate and I suppose the elbows are going to come out further. That's when it begins to get interesting.”

Audience expectations and championship implications

For spectators, during this dual battle, getting interesting will likely be appreciated in the form of a track duel rather than a data-driven decision regarding incidents. Especially since for F1 the alternative perception from these events isn't very inspiring.

Honestly speaking, McLaren are making the correct decisions for their interests and it has paid off. They secured their tenth team championship in Singapore (though a great achievement diminished by the fuss prompted by the Norris-Piastri moment) and with Stella as squad leader they possess a moral and upright commander who genuinely wants to do the right thing.

Racing purity against squad control

Yet having drivers in a championship fight looking to the pitwall for resolutions is unedifying. Their contest should be decided through racing. Luck and destiny will have roles, but better to let them just battle freely and observe outcomes naturally, than the impression that every disputed moment will be pored over by the squad to determine if intervention is needed and subsequently resolved afterwards behind closed doors.

The scrutiny will intensify and each time it happens it risks possibly affecting outcomes that could be critical. Already, after the team made for position swaps at Monza because Norris had endured a delayed stop and Piastri believing he had been hard done by with the strategy call at Hungary, where Norris won, the spectre of a fear of favouritism also emerges.

Team perspective and future challenges

No one wants to see a title constantly disputed over perceived that the efforts to be fair were unequal. When asked if he believed the squad had managed to do right by both drivers, Piastri said he believed they had, but noted it's a developing process.

“There’s been some difficult situations and we discussed a number of things,” he said post-race. “But ultimately it's educational with the whole team.”

Six races stay. McLaren have little wriggle room left for last-minute adjustments, so it may be better to just close the books and withdraw from the fray.